Sanity (Un)Checked
Bits and pieces that don’t make into Sanity Checked in Front and Finish
Judging Junkie
December 12th, 2008
It’s about time I got back to this. For a large part of the past year or so I’ve been entirely too busy with a book project. That project was ultimately canceled, and for a time after that I just goofed off, trying to learn how to manage having free time again. And then just as I was getting the hang of it, I signed on for… yes, another book project.
I’ve already promised my wife that this time will be different – no working late into the night to meet deadlines, no passing up dog shows to work on a book, and so on. Of course, having been married as long as we have, she’ll believe it when she sees it.
The title of this post came to me this past weekend as I was doing something I hadn’t done for more than a year. I was at a UKC trial, showing, and NOT judging. I was down at the Fort Hamilton UKC club’s trial in Cincinnati and I had a great time – the facility is nice, the people are wonderful, Molly won High Combined and qualified in both Utility and Open twice in a row… in other words a great weekend.
But I noticed something. Being just an exhibitor was nice, it was relaxing, it was a pleasant change from all of the judging I’ve done… yeah, you guessed it… it was also a bit boring. Over the past two years I’ve clearly become addicted to judging, to the point that if I’m not judging, I miss it. Who would have thought it?
Posted in Dogs, Obedience, UKC |
New Addition - Aeryn
May 13th, 2007
Yesterday we got a new puppy, yet another Ridgeview aussie, yet another black tri, yet another girl. Her registered name will be Ridgeview’s Peacekeeper, and her call name will be “Aeryn” after the _Farscape’s _Aeryn Sun, the cranky but ultimately good former Peacekeeper soldier. (if you’re not hopeless Sci-Fi geeks, you may need to refer to the link to have any clue what I’m talking about)
We had kicked around some other ideas, but nothing stuck. I’d always wanted to name a dog “Outlaw Belle Star” and call her Belle, but someone pointed out to me the irony of naming an obedience dog “Outlaw”. If we were getting a red, I would have been happy to call her “I Love Lucy”, if for no other reason than I could do a Desi Arnaz impression and say ” Lucy, you got some ’splaining to do…” Fortunately for the dog training world, there were no reds in the this litter, so you all will be spared that joy.
Finally I hit on the Aeryn idea. Her namesake is tough, smart, brave, cranky, sometimes hard to live with, but basically moving in the right direction. If my Aeryn turns out the same way, I think I’ll take it.

Posted in Obedience | No Comments »
First UKC Judging Assignment
March 12th, 2007
I survived. Yesterday (03/11/07) I completed my first UKC judging assigment at For Your Canine in Schiller Park, IL. It was a great trial, nice building, excellent organization, etc. I really couldn’t have been luckier for a first time judging. Despite literally being next door to O’Hare airport, the aircraft noise wasn’t bad, and certainly didn’t bother the dogs.
The teams were also pretty darned good, including former National Obedience Champ Lynn Heidinger, who handled with her usual precision and grace. That was fun to judge.
In any case, I made it through the day without too many goofs, and I honestly don’t think I messed anyone up. Judges probably should borrow that part of the Hippocratic oath - “First, do no harm.”
Becky and Riker also tried for their 3rd UUD leg, but didn’t make it, and Molly was a bored diva most of the day, poor girl.
Anyway, it was a great experience, but now, the day after, my legs are almost as sore as they used to be after a marathon.
Posted in Obedience | No Comments »
Currently Readlng
September 10th, 2006
I’m currently reading Excel-Erated Learning, by Pamela Reid and I recommend it highly. It’s an attempt to put uptodate research on canine learning into terms that dog trainers and handlers can understand and use.
The most impressive thing so far? She has a clear and compelling explanation of just how and why the classic ear pinch works so well for training the retrieve.
When we were keeping and training Maya, I followed the classic method for the first time, blindly following the instructions off of an Ann Marie Silverton video. And it worked. In fact Maya ended up with a great forced retrieve at the age of 6 months.
I was surprised and somewhat puzzled, since the “take it” command is never used until the earpinch is first applied, and the pinch is applied no matter how the dog acts. Seemed unfair to me.
And that shows how much I knew. It turns out the method is so effective because you are teaching the dog that “take it” means “ear pinch” and that they can stop the ear pinch if the grab the dumbbell quickly enough. This gives them control and tends to make the behavior self-reinforcing - every time they retrieve they feel as they have successfully beaten the pinch.
Dang… I never would have thought of that..
Posted in Obedience | No Comments »
The “Un”-AKC
August 30th, 2006
While I’m on a roll, I should mention that the UKC has released their answer to the AKC conflict of interest policy. It’s almost funny - it’s the opposite of the AKC’s in almost every way.
While the AKC is out to crush competition and extract loyalty from its judges, with a “we made you and we can break you” sort of attitude, the UKC statement (http://www.ukcdogs.com, news item for 08/10/20076) flat out states that judges have the right to judge wherever they’re qualified. And that wider experience makes them better judges, which benefits the sport, which in turn benefits the UKC. Very enlightened, indeed.
Of course there’s always a “gotcha”. The reason I’m not quoting the UKC statement verbatim is that it’s copyrighted and the person I contacted at their offices hinted that I’d better not use it without permission. I guess enlightenment only goes so far.
Posted in AKC, Obedience, UKC | No Comments »
UKC Judging Thoughts
August 30th, 2006
Having just gone through the UKC’s process to become an obedience judge, I thought I’d note a few things that helped along the way.
First of all, do your homework. The process isn’t impossibly difficult, but at every step being prepared helps. Read the rules, practice calling commands, etc. The horror stories I heard from judges about unqualified judge candidates all tended to be about people who assumed their license would be handed to them with no effort on their part.
Secondly, be willing to go the extra mile, particularly when you apprentice. You may only have to do the official classes, but be willing to help with whatever else is on offer. I judged a fun match at my first apprenticeship and at the second when a courtesy dog was needed I jumped in to offer Molly. In other words, plan on being around for the whole day and make yourself useful.
Finally, make and use personal contacts. Even before you start the process talk to the judges you show under, get their advice and support. (Of course you are actually showing in UKC, right? ;-) Established judges have a lot of great advice and when you get to the point of setting up apprenticeships, it’s much easier if the judges you are asking know you and have a sense that you are serious about it.
OK, so nothing too surprising, I admit. But it worked for me.
Posted in Obedience, UKC | No Comments »
It’s Official
July 26th, 2006
I am now UKC obedience judge #6679, licensed for all classes. Wow… Things are going to start happening to me now….
Actually, I was very impressed by the UKC’s judge approval process. Unlike some other huge registry that will remain nameless, it is actually possible to qualify to judge all 3 classes in a reasonable time. The written test was tricky, but not unfairly so, the prerequisites seemed fair, and the apprenticeship requirement turned out to be the best part of the whole exercise.
I had heard judges telling horror stories of shockingly unqualified apprentices and the like, but the current rules, requiring a UKC title at the level you are applying for, seem to have taken care of that.
Anyway, I was a bit concerned that as an apprentice I would be viewed as liability, but quite the opposite was true. The judges, trial officials, even the exhibitors were amazingly supportive and welcoming. The judges in particular bent over backwards to give as much advice as they could. Each of them wanted me to avoid the mistakes they had made. For that I thank them, but I’m afraid in the end it won’t really work. I probably wouldn’t have made their mistakes anyway, and I’m certain I’ll go and find my own mistakes to make.
Posted in Obedience, UKC | No Comments »
Apprentice Judging Complete
July 19th, 2006
So it’s finished.
This past weekend I finished my UKC apprentice judging with John Fowler and Janice Scherzer, after starting with Jerry Shields two weeks earlier. My deepest thanks to all three of them for doing their best to be supportive and trying their darnedest to make sure I don’t repeat their mistakes. I got three slightly different views and approaches and the whole process was very educational.
Apprenticing was fun in an odd way. First of all, you are in the ring with the officiating judge, which is a view a trial that most of us are not so familiar with. But as an apprentice, not only are you supposed to be watching everything that goes on, you also have to be sure to stay out of the way and make sure you don’t stress an already nervous dog and/or handler. So it can be a bit intense at first.
In fact, the first trial was the hardest. Not that Jerry was hard to work with (far from it) but all of the mental processing I had to do as I learned what to watch for was tough. The second trial was easier, and the third was the easiest of all. Not that it was exactly easy, mind you, but at least it started to seem managable.
I was also pleased that my scores were in the same ballpark as all three judges. I had been thinking I would end up either being way to easy or way to hard.
Anyway, I have to wait until the paperwork clears the UKC home office, something that may not be fast, and then I should be good to go.
Posted in UKC | No Comments »
Blog woes…
July 17th, 2006
If you’ve read this blog before you may notice that several of the entries are missing. That’s because we’ve been under minor attack from crackers. In early July the site got trashed twice (on consecutive weekends) and I ended up having to restore from an old backup.
I guess this would be a good time to insert some conventional wisdom about keeping everything backed up, but right now I’m too irritated to bother.
Needless to say, a few changes will be made…
Posted in
[Obedience](https://web.archive.org/web/20081204111039/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=3 "View all posts in Obedience")
|
[No Comments »](https://web.archive.org/web/20081204111039/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?p=10#respond "Comment on Blog woes…")
## Apprentice Judging, here I come
I mentioned earlier that I had qualified to be an apprentice judge for UKC. I now have my three apprentice assignments tentatively set up.
The first would be with Jerry Shields on July 1. I’ve always enjoyed showing under Jerry, even if things didn’t always go right, so I’m grateful he agreed so quickly.
The second and third are both the weekend of July 15-16. This double play is largely thanks to John Fowler, first for agreeing to have me and second for suggesting to me that I ask Janice Scherzer for the next day.
So I stand to finish my apprentice judging in the space of two weeks. Given that UKC trials are not that common, this an amazing set up.
Thanks to everyone.
Posted in
[Obedience](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=3 "View all posts in Obedience")
April 12th, 2006 by vern |
[No comments](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?p=14#respond "Comment on Apprentice Judging, here I come")
## Outdoors rules
Last weekend (April Fool’s day) we went to a trial hosted by a GSD club down in Indy. It was a typical “nice” spring day in Indiana - chilly, cloudy, breezy, threatening rain… and the trial was outdoors. Yeah, they actually still do some of those around here.
Of course most people avoid outdoor trials. Either they are top handlers who don’t want to risk a lower score or can’t be bothered for such tiny trials, or they are less skilled trainers who don’t train outside and can’t believe that their dogs can work outdoors. And I guess a lot of people only train indoors.
Well, as it happens, I train outdoors the vast majority of the time. Summer, winter, whenever, most of my training time ends up being outside, usually on my lunch hour at school, since Molly goes to school with me every day anyway.
So you would think we would have an advantage at an outdoor trial. You would think so, and for once that would be right. Molly turned in what was arguably her best ever Utility run and won Utility B with a 192. Of course there was only one other dog entered, so we got no points, but still it was an eye-opener. Now, to look for more outdoor trials.
Posted in
[Obedience](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=3 "View all posts in Obedience")
April 5th, 2006 by vern |
[No comments](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?p=13#respond "Comment on Outdoors rules")
## The AKC “Steals” My Idea…
About a month ago I wrote my
_[Front and Finish](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://frontandfinish.com/)_
article for April. My suggestion then was that moaning about the lack of television coverage for obedience was pointless, since the entertainment industry mainly goes with things that have been proven.
I suggested that we needed to break out our video cameras and tape events and post them on the web as a way to build interest in the sport.
Great minds must think alike, because guess what has just shown up on the AKC’s web site…
[22 QuickTime video clips](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://www.akc.org/events/obedience/crufts/2006/)
of the international competition at Crufts. And the look like they were taken by an amateur with a personal video camera.
If they would have just waited until F&F was actually published I could have claimed they stole my idea. But as it is, it’s a start. So get yourself over there and start downloading.
Posted in
[Obedience](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=3 "View all posts in Obedience")
March 24th, 2006 by vern |
[No comments](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?p=12#respond "Comment on The AKC ")
## Starting on the Judging Road
I am now officially a UKC apprentice judge for all classes of obedience. I started the process in January and took the written test three weeks ago. The first part of the process was a lengthy resume of my life in dogs, which took a while to pull together. After they accepted that they sent me their written test.
The written test is 25 multiple choice and true/false questions and is open book. That sounds easy, but the questions are worded to be tricky and they cover the whole spectrum of the rules fairly well. I spent about two hours on it, working through all the possibilities with the rulebook, and ended up getting all 25 right.
The next step is to apprentice judge three times. An apprentice follows a licensed judge in the ring at a trial, and at the end the apprentice’s score sheets are compared to the judge and the judge decides whether or not the apprentice judged according to the rules.
All of this sounds like a bit of a hassle, but it’s a far easier process than the AKC’s and I think the UKC can use the support.
So if you see me following a judge in the next year or so….
Posted in
[Obedience](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=3 "View all posts in Obedience")
February 28th, 2006 by vern |
[No comments](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?p=11#respond "Comment on Starting on the Judging Road")
## Ratings woes
We got our February issue of
_[Front and Finish](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://www.frontandfinish.com/)_
freakishly early this month, (last Tuesday, to be exact) and it took Becky only a second to see that the Open A and Utility A ratings published were not quite right.
They were listed as being the 2005 ratings, but she could tell that they didn’t take into account all of 2005, because she and Riker had scores from October that clearly weren’t in the points calculations. More checking of other dogs we knew confirmed this.
I sent an email to Bob Self, Jr and after some checking it turns out that there were two errors involved. First, the ratings were supposed to have been for 2004, not 2005, since the 2004 OA and UA ratings were never published. Apparently the title had gotten changed in later stages of publication.
The second problem the was that the 2005 ratings were used, which were incomplete since F&F hasn’t recieved all of results from the AKC yet.
It boggles belief that the AKC hasn’t yet gotten around to sending 3 lousy Excel files to Bob, particularly since the results for all of 2005 have been on the web site for a month now, but that’s a different issue.
Anyway, look for F&F to be reprinting the 2004 OA and UA ratings in the next month or two.
**Update**
It now looks as though the 2004 results will be posted on the F&F website, and the 2005 ratings will be in the March issue. It was starting to be a bit late for 2004 and thanks to some phone calls to the AKC, Bob got the full 2005 results over the weekend.
Posted in
[Obedience](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=3 "View all posts in Obedience")
February 6th, 2006 by vern |
[No comments](https://web.archive.org/web/20060520000804/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?p=10#respond "Comment on Ratings woes")
## Injury Update
February 5th, 2006
Since my last post we’ve managed to stabilize the injury situation. Molly, in spite of being the old lady at almost 7, turned out to in better shape and is coming back from her strained shoulders nicely. She should be 100% by March.
Riker, on the other hand, turned out to have a more serious problem. We started to fear a ligament tear in his knee, so we got him in for x-rays. The vet played it very cool at the initial visit, but it was clear that’s what he was thinking, too. In fact, to everyone’s surprise (including the vet, who took extra x-rays to make sure) Riker’s knees and rear joints were fine.
That lead to the conclusion that he had a bad groin pull, instead of a knee injury. Let me tell you, we were overjoyed to have that diagnosis. Recovery will be slow, but now after a couple of weeks of complete rest (yes, he IS going stir crazy) he is starting to put full weight on it and the limp is going away.
Posted in
[Dogs](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=2 "View all posts in Dogs")
|
[No Comments »](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?p=8#respond "Comment on Injury Update")
## Ouch….
January 22nd, 2006
Injuries (not to put to fine a point on it) suck. And they suck even worse when it’s not ourselves, but our canine teammates, who are suffering.
This past month has seen both of our aussies come up lame. Molly was first. We were barely into the new year when she decided to prove to some youngsters that she might be middle-aged, but by gum she still had some speed. I didn’t actually see it, but Becky reports that she put on a truly stunning burst of speed. Good for you kid.
Except, of course that by nightfall she couldn’t put any weight on her right front foot. I was strongly reminded of the time I hobbled for days after out-sprinting a 15 year-old at the end of a 5K.
Riker soon followed by hurting his right back knee doing sharp turns around a tree while playing with a new little friend.
Runners soon learn that the one thing that most increases your odds of getting injured is already being injured. You think you’re OK, but push just slightly over the edge and you’re back where you started, or worse.
And that’s exactly what Molly and Riker have been going through. A little limping in the evening, then apparently OK the next day, but as soon as we turn our backs, one or the other will put on extra sprint and end up limping again.
So we’ve clamped down even tighter on their activities and that seems to be helping. The problem is that they both are now so bored from reduced activity that they are even
**more**
likely to go bananas if we don’t watch them.
Did I mention that injuries suck?
Posted in
[Dogs](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=2 "View all posts in Dogs")
|
[No Comments »](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?p=7#respond "Comment on Ouch....")
#No, I’m not gonna wear black pants…
January 2nd, 2006
…yet, anyway.
I’m referring to a discussion I’ve been having with my wife Becky about the effects of wardrobe on obedience scores. In Lansing back in December the first day we were second to last in Utility B with a 187.5. That wasn’t great, but what was worse was that the guy who got last place had a 187, and screwed up WAY worse than we did. Actually, he should have flunked for missing the drop.
So why did he get the breaks and I get the shaft? Well, the only two differences we could see were that he had a golden while Molly is an aussie, and that he was dressed corporate casual while I was in jeans, flannel shirt and athletic trainers.
Molly can rest easy - I have no plans to trade her in for a swamp collie.
Now obedience is supposed to be about performance, not appearance, but the woman who came in second at the National Invitational last year scandalized the sport by competing at that august venue in *gasp* jeans and a baseball cap. So it is just possible that I was offending the wardrobe gods. So I did say that I would experiment with clothing. Of course I was thinking I would wear my regular khaki school pants with say a green shirt. For me that would be dramatic enough. Becky on the other hand, heard it as permission to “dress” me. Rest easy. That misconception has been corrected.
I’ll keep you posted as to whether khaki is a more powerful dog show fabric than denim. If it works? Well, then Becky may just get her chance.
Posted in
[Dogs](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=2 "View all posts in Dogs"),
[Obedience](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=3 "View all posts in Obedience"),
[AKC](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=5 "View all posts in AKC")
|
[No Comments »](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?p=6#respond "Comment on No, I'm not gonna wear black pants...")
## The UDX Equation
December 29th, 2005
I just submitted my February article where I talk a little bit about the probabilities of double qualifiers in the pursuit of a UDX. It seems a little counter-intuitive, but if qualifying in the two classes is really unrelated, the odds against double Q’s increase dramatically as the pass rates in those classes decline.
I wonder if anyone will make the argument that the two classes are more closely related. The problem with addressing that argument is that no one has enough info to even guess at how much of correlation there might be. Let us all thank the AKC for not reporting when someone flunks, only when they qualify…
Still, if a lot of people report beating the average, there might be something to it. It only stands to reason that there are occasions where a team is “on” and more likely to qualify in both and other occasions when they are not and so are likely to flunk both.
I guess I almost hope I’m wrong - it’s really sort of depressing if the probabilities are right.
Posted in [Dogs](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=2 "View all posts in Dogs"), [Obedience](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=3 "View all posts in Obedience"), [AKC](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=5 "View all posts in AKC") | [No Comments »](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?p=5#respond "Comment on The UDX Equation")
## Finally, we do something right
December 12th, 2005
This past weekend Molly and I did Utility at the Lansing, MI shows. We did OK, qualifying in the mid/upper 180’s both days. There were some mistakes, of course, but none of the them were major, and we both stayed on the same page the entire time, which was a big improvement.
We only did Utility (instead of trying for UDX legs) because we had been having some trouble staying connected and focused between exercises. Some trouble? As Kent Delaney put it last spring, “It looks like she doesn’t even know you’re in the ring.” UKC hasn’t been quite so bad, but we’ve been struggling in AKC.
Judie Howard gave me some very useful tips on improving attention and Pat Kelly pointed out what a fine line you have to walk with a dog like Molly. She has high drive and she wants to please, but she also is independent enough that if you are too loose and happy, she’ll do whatever she wants. But if you are too harsh and strict, she’ll opt out of the game.
Just realizing that I had a very small margin for error helped. It means that I have to focus more on my handling and Molly’s attitude, making sure I adjust quickly to keep her working. It also reassured me that my training is not so bad, it’s just managing Molly in the ring that’s tricky. In fact that had been the biggest frustration - brilliant runs in practice, great attention out of the ring, followed by distracted and spaced out performances. Of course not all of our performances were that bad - I sometimes hit a good combination almost by accident.
So this weekend was a test to see if what Judie and Pat were telling me about getting and holding attention would help. It did. We may have made some mistakes and scored low for the class, but Molly was with me and keyed in pretty much the whole time. She even survived a sendout to the wrong corner and a stand for exam with the one thing she really fears, a vacuum cleaner, running at the other end of the hall. Now if we can just keep this trend going next year…
Posted in [Dogs](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=2 "View all posts in Dogs"), [Obedience](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=3 "View all posts in Obedience"), [AKC](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=5 "View all posts in AKC") | [No Comments »](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?p=4#respond "Comment on Finally, we do something right")
## Why do dogs need blogs, anyway?
November 30th, 2005
OK, let’s get the introductory material out of the way. I’m Vern Ceder and I write a column called _Sanity Check_ for [_Front and Finish_](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://www.frontandfinish.com/). Hey, this month Molly and I even made the cover, for no greater reason than that I write a column and the editors like it. _Front and Finish_ is mostly dedicated to training dogs for AKC and UKC obedience competition, and my column tries to explore some of the things that make dog trainers crazy. Actually, it has been suggested that we’re crazy to begin with, but that’s a different question.
In any case, it struck me that there were several items in my notes that for whatever reason weren’t right for publication in my column, but still might be worth chewing over in a public way. I think that pretty much explains what I’m doing here and why I chose the name.
Of course that still leaves the title question unswered. A quick search indicates that very few dogs (and not many more dog trainers) have actually jumped on this blogging bandwagon. As far as I can tell, Molly, my Australian shepherd, is completely unimpressed by the blogging phenomenon. As to trainers, from what I can tell, email lists seem to be the preferred mode of online interaction - they allow for the sharing of ideas and flames without the real-time constraints of chat.
So here I am to have a shot a filling the gap. While I’m sure I won’t be posting daily, or even all that regularly, I will do my best to avoid being one of the many three post wonders that show up on the blog sites.
Oh, yeah, one last promise - this will be the only time, barring extreme provocation, that the words “dog blog” will appear together at this venue. Really.
Posted in [Dogs](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=2 "View all posts in Dogs"), [Obedience](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?cat=3 "View all posts in Obedience") | [No Comments »](https://web.archive.org/web/20060715122354/http://dogsinmotion.com/wordpress/?p=2#respond "Comment on Why do dogs need blogs, anyway?")